The13th
Floor is a solid film about reality, consciousness and playing God. It's about
what our little lives are all about, and what happens when we drive to the end
of the road, and go somewhere we've never been. It is about charting new
territory, and the limitations of mindsets. It is breaking through barriers to
find the truth.
It is also about the inability of the mind to accept that we may just be a
figment of imagination dreamt up wholesale.
This film is based on a book called "Simulacron-3," by Daniel F.
Galouye, which I have heard of but not read. I do not personally know the
faithfulness of the film to the book, but there is an excellent discussion on
this in the Production
Notes section of the website. In fact, the website reveals the
extraordinary insight that this is a product of German origin, which is not
necessarily evident from the film itself.
A
great fan of Fritz Lang's work, I am only starting to go back and look at the
possible influences on this piece
lighting, moodiness, attitude,
distance, futility, hope, happiness
all could have different meanings now
that the origins are clear. No matter. It is what it is, and I must accept it.
Set in the
present day, 13th Floor presents a murder mystery spanning worlds, one of them
a virtual world set in 1937. A genius (for which the standard is still
Einstein) develops a computer tool to take consciousness into the virtual
setting. He is murdered, and suspicion falls on Douglas Hall, the assistant.
Douglas must enter this untested virtual world for the first time to discover
what message his boss left him.
What
Douglas discovers is that the "people" in the computer world actually
have a consciousness. They are real, but not by our concept of flesh and bone.
And what to do about them, the girl who is strangely familiar, and his own
predicament, forms the basis for this noir thriller.
The
direction is by Josef Rusnak, in his first feature. He 2nd unit directed on
Godzilla. Production by Roland Emmerich, Ute Emmerich (Roland's sister), and
Marco Weber. I recommend watching all of these people very closely. They are
determined, and productive, and with the rest of the engine of Centropolis
Entertainment, will be providing probably a tenth of the quality entertainment
of the next decade. Which is saying something.
|
The acting
is good, but not spectacular, including a by-the-00100111001100011's detective
(Dennis Haysbert). In fact, he is almost a cliché, which like the other
acting, works to the point of the story quite well. Vincent D'Onofrio is very
strange in his portrayal of a computer programmer and a computer
programmee. He/it add a lot to the look and feel of the film.
The sets
are excellent*, and the story detailed enough to make it worthwhile seeing. It
has huge production standards, courtesy of the burgeoning Centropolis
Entertainment group spawned by Roland Emmerich, Dean Devlin, et al. And they
provide enough polish and spit to sew it all up into a nice package.
Comparisons
will be made to The Matrix, but this is nothing like it, aside from
consciousness in a virtual world. It is also reminiscent of Dark City. More
like that. This too is mystery/detective fused with sci-fi as a premise, not
action/adventure. There are no aliens here, though the stars should probably
see an alienist after this is all over. Multiple personalities on screen tend
to work their way into real life, if you can believe Brazilian Soap stars.
Enough
about that.
What is
most curious about this film is that it is not a summer film. Wrongly
advertised as action/adventure/sci-fi, it does not belong in the current crop
of fun flicks. It is serious, and thought provoking, and interesting, but not
"fun". Even the website has an entire section devoted to
philosophers, no less. Find something like that on the
WWW website...(and that is a kick-ass
website, me droogies
) The Thirteenth Floor felt like a fall film.
And I question the sense of the title. I am not particularly intrigued by the
number 13, and it evokes more of "13 Ghosts" and the supernatural
than they may realize (most of the principles are of German extraction, and it
would be interesting to know if there is a cultural significance to 13 in
Germany not shared here, or vice versa). Anyway I like Simulacron-3 better as a
title.
Should or shouldn't, it doesn't matter that there really are no shoulds where
film audiences are concerned. The unfortunate thing is that this film will not
receive its due, opening just 9 days after SW1. It will be lost completely when
Austin Powers, Tarzan, South Park, the General's Daughter and WWW open, not to
mention the others awaiting arrival this summer.
Too bad.
|
| 3d anyone? |
I started criticizing the film because of the idea that a
3D world could be complete enough to look like it did in the movie.
Then I watched a streetcar
zoom by from close left of screen to center screen, and it did not look ragged
enough.
And it passed too cose to the camera, one of my
own stock-in-trade 3d animation techniques. Then I stopped and asked
myself: Ted? How do I know what is
real here, anyway?
I am sitting in a movie
produced by 3-D experts. And not only that, I recently lauded up SW1 for its
portrayal of worlds in 3-D. About the only real things in SW1 were the
recognizable human actors, and Ewan McGregor.
I took another
look at the downtown, the buildings, and people, and realized that I was
probably looking at mostly 3-D, especially on the long shots. I am sure the
streetcar was.
And if it
wasn't, curse you Centropolis! for making me look at things differently, for
making me question my reality! (Before I got to make you question
yours!)
sigh.
|
|