|
By Ted Baldwin |
| Summer Of Sam Sorry to say, I can offer an opinion on Lee's latest... |
Reviewed: Started 7/9/99 Concluded: 11/26/99 |
![]() |
|||
| FIVE POSSIBLE | |||||
In a not-too surprising interview at Cannes, Director Spike Lee commented on the "racism" apparent in The Phantom Menace. That is to say, that George Lucas used a "Stepin Fetchit" character to consciously demean blacks everywhere. In his opinion, he recounted how the character Jar Jar was racist, then added that George Lucas didn't care cause he had more money than God. And that Lucas was using the young black actor who would do anything to make Lucas happy, even sell out his own racial pride. In effect, the young man was too stupid to realize he was playing into the hands of the "racist". (This was reported on the Cinescape Online web magazine, by the individual who talked to Lee. If minor details are in error, please forgive me, but the essence of the intent is as I stated. Look up the Cinescape archives for more info on Lee's statement.) And this salient view was based on the "word of friends who saw it, and in whom he could trust." Mr. Lee did not even see Phantom Menace before passing his judgement. And no one reporting on Mr. Lee bothered to question his ability to judge second hand. |
|||||
QUESTION: What if George Lucas offered any opinion on "Summer of Sam" - let alone making charges of racism -without having seen it? Or even having seen it? ANSWER: Lucas would have been pilloried at least. Damned, certainly. And the press would not have been blase' and friendly about it. This dear reader, is what is known as a "double standard". Wouldn't this be a better place if there were a single standard? Well, that is not Lee's fault. But the content of "Summer of Sam" is, presumably. Sorry to say, I can offer an opinion on Lee's latest, and while I stop short of labeling it a racist exercise (I understand some Italians are pretty upset about the stereotyping), I can assure you that if a white director attempted to offer up such a pastiche of half-baked cliche's and characterizations about African Americans, they would be hung out to dry. And the film is supposedly about intolerance! But, let's give Lee something he was unwilling to give Lucas -the benefit of the doubt. In his defense, I guess, Spike Lee appeared on Fox News, with one of the authors, an Italian-American. He seemed a lot nicer on the O'Reilly Factor than he had ever seemed before, and he seemed out of his element. Or I should say, Lee did not seem combative, but perhaps a little flustered at the negative attention he was getting. (Some Italian American groups raised a hue and cry at the portrayals in Summer of Sam.) Lee tried defending his position on the film, but really only dug himself in deeper. I came to regard him as someone who catapulted into fame early, without the "foundation" (as one of my dear friends puts it) to support his work. Maybe he really cannot see the venom in this film - I pray that is so. Believing that this was an intentional slam against Whites and Italians would be too sad. For the world. Stylistically, Summer of Sam aspires to the new wave of hip and fashion-laden direction. There are moments in the film, but it seems like every time Lee starts to go somewhere, he bogs it down in reprehensible and noxious stereotypes - or just wildly inappropriate behavior. Its as if a bunch of guys sitting around a coffee pot said "Cool! That's really outrageous - put that in there!" about a thousand times. With no cohesive rhyme or reason. And the moment when the dog actually speaks to Sam? Which I wanted to see earlier in the film than when it appears? All I could think of was the "Davey and Goliath" Son of Sam parody on MAD TV. Lee's rendition of Sam was so bad as to be laughable. Which, at that point, signaled the death knell for whatever respect I had for the film. I wanted to be shocked and outraged the way I was during the good first hour of "Natural Born Killers" (that was going to be the best film of a generation until minute 61). Instead, raw disappointment. Oh well. |
|
||||
| This review was
"lost" when the lightning struck in July. I managed to finally find
the file after a day of drive reconstructing - but it took me until now (Nov.
26) to get the time to hunt for it. I am sure there was more written, but I got
the 100 points back - that was the truly irreplaceable part. Still, five months
after seeing the film, I cannot be soft on it. I thought back on what I saw to
ask myself if I was being too hard on it - and I was on Lee. I have cooled of a
lot since the screening. So this review reflects a moderated opinion based, in
part, on the Fox News show interview with Lee. I actually think he might be an
OK guy if he weren't caught in the crush of international race relations. That
affects his every move, and how he is looked at, and I am sure there are many
and mighty expectations of him. Hard to be free when you become an icon. But
what he put on film will last for many centuries after we are gone, and
canonization of that is what I take issue with... I wish Mr. Lee well, and I hope he finds his stride. |
|||||